Hello Artur,

Thank you for your reply.
Should it work in a stable version like Postgresql 9.4, since it's enough for me and I don't care whether it's 9.6 or 9.5.
Nevertheless I will try it using 9.4.

Regards,
Weiping

On 01.03.2016 22:04, Artur Zakirov wrote:
Hello, Weiping

It seems that it is a bug. Thank you for report. I guess it will be fixed soon.

On 01.03.2016 17:36, Weiping Qu wrote:
Dear postgresql general mailing list,

I am currently using the logical decoding feature (version 9.6 I think
as far as I found in the source, wal_level: logical,
max_replication_slot: > 1, track_commit_timestamp: on, I am not sure
whether this will help or not).
Following the online documentation, everything works fine until I input

SELECT * FROM pg_logical_slot_peek_changes('regression_slot', NULL,
NULL, 'include-timestamp', 'on');


I always got 1999-12-31 16:00 as the commit time for arbitrary
transactions with DML statements.
After several tries, I realize that the txn->commit_time returned was
always 0.
Could you help me by indicating me what could be wrong in my case? Any
missing parameters set?

Thank you in advance,
Kind Regards,
Weiping







--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to