On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo < fjmolinabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> Now i execute the same in pgsql 9.4.5 and all is fine!!! >>> >>> The EXPLAINs are: >>> >>> - pgsql 9.5.1: >>> >>> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.03..492944.81 rows=276095 width=4) >>> -> Seq Scan on _gc_tb a (cost=0.00..3321.30 rows=120130 width=66) >>> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on _gc_cat b (cost=0.03..4.06 rows=2 >>> width=70) >>> Recheck Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama)) >>> -> Bitmap Index Scan on _gc_cat_arama_gin >>> (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=2 width=0) >>> Index Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND >>> (a.arama <@ arama)) >>> >>> >>> - pgsql 9.4.5: >>> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.03..492944.81 rows=276095 width=4) >>> -> Seq Scan on _gc_tb a (cost=0.00..3321.30 rows=120130 width=66) >>> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on _gc_cat b (cost=0.03..4.06 rows=2 >>> width=70) >>> Recheck Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama)) >>> -> Bitmap Index Scan on _gc_cat_arama_gin >>> (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=2 width=0) >>> Index Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) >>> AND >>> (a.arama <@ arama)) >>> >> >> The above are exactly the same, so if they are indeed from the different >> versions I do not see an issue. The question to ask here is whether the >> above are actually from the different Postgres instances? >> >> > yes these are differents > It would be nice to see the output of "EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, TIMING, BUFFERS)" so real timings can be observed. David J.
