Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 04/28/2016 11:48 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Vik Fearing <v...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
On 04/28/2016 08:30 PM, Israel Brewster wrote:
This is probably crazy talk, but in Postgresql is there any way to have
a "keyed" sequence? That is, I have a table with a list of departments.
While *relatively* static, technically speaking this is a dynamic
list -
someone certainly could decide to add a department, or combine two
departments into one new one, whatever. In any case, I would ideally
like to have a sequence per department, but since the list is dynamic
it's not as simple as creating 33 independent sequences and then having
a lookup table somewhere, although I guess I could implement something
of the sort with triggers.
What would be the point of this? Why not just one sequence for all
departments?
continuity and appearance, not to mention simple logical progression.
In this case, the sequence is being used to generate a PO number.
Company style indicates that a PO number is a department code followed
by a unique number. With one sequence for all departments, you could
(will) end up with discontinuous PO numbers in any given department.
It would be nice if, after issuing PO number 15-1, the next PO in
department 15 was 2, if for no other reason than the accounting
department could easily see that they aren't missing any. With one
sequence, there will quite likely not be a PO number 2 for any given
department, so that department has no easy way to keep track of their
PO's based on PO number.
Here is a similar idea:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/44e376f6.7010...@seaworthysys.com
BAM!! You beat me to it!!
I have repeated that pattern multiple times and it is the exact use case
the OP has.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
