wal_keep_segments is set to 32.

Here is the replication slot:

    slot_name    |
n6lbb2vmohwuxoyk_00018732_f58b5354_79ad_4e6e_b18b_47acb1d7ce1f
    plugin       | test_decoding
    slot_type    | logical
    datoid       | 18732
    database     | omitted
    active       | f
    xmin         |
    catalog_xmin | 84884044
    restart_lsn  | 1B3/4300CA60

Can an inactive replication slot cause WALs to be retained?

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:

> Scott Moynes wrote:
> > I have a PostgreSQL server that is not recycling WAL files. Log files are
> > continually created and no old log files are ever removed.
> >
> > Running PostgreSQL v 9.4.8 with archive settings:
> >
> >     archive_mode = on
> >     archive_command = /bin/true
> >
> > Checkpoint logging is enabled and does not record any logs being
> recycled:
>
> See the wal_keep_segments option, as well as existance of any
> replication slot (select * from pg_replication_slots).
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>



-- 
Scott Moynes
VM Farms

Reply via email to