On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Not really. Your best bet is to reduce the > autovacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age limit, so that vacuums are able to > get rid of multixacts sooner (and/or reduce > autovacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age, so that whole-table vacuuming > takes place earlier). Thank you very much. I will adjust those settings. Is there a way, something similar to keeping an eye on `age(relfrozenxid)`, that I can watch this and keep an eye on it before it becomes a problem?
