On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:17 PM Kaixi Luo <kaixi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a primary PostgreSQL server with 64GB of RAM that is replicated
> using streaming replication to a hot standby server with 16GB of RAM.
>
Do you have different hardware configuration for master and standby? I am
not sure if that is the right thing to do. I usually prefer them to be
equally sized and have same configuration. But may be someone else with
more experience can comment better on that aspect.
> My problem is as follows: I've detected a query that takes a long time to
> run on my primary server but runs very fast on the standby server. I did an
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE on the query:
>
>
What is the version of PostgreSQL on both servers? Check with
select version();
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> SELECT this_.id AS id1_31_0_,
> this_.nom AS nom2_31_0_,
> this_.nom_slug AS nom3_31_0_,
> this_.descripcio AS descripc4_31_0_,
> this_.url AS url5_31_0_,
> this_.data_captura AS data6_31_0_,
> this_.data_publicacio AS data7_31_0_,
> this_.propietari AS propieta8_31_0_,
> this_.privacitat AS privacit9_31_0_,
> this_.desnivellpujada AS desnive10_31_0_,
> this_.desnivellbaixada AS desnive11_31_0_,
> this_.longitud AS longitu13_31_0_,
> this_.beginpoint AS beginpo14_31_0_,
> this_.endpoint AS endpoin15_31_0_,
> this_.caixa3d AS caixa16_31_0_,
> this_.pic_id AS pic17_31_0_,
> this_.skill AS skill18_31_0_,
> this_.spatial_type AS spatial19_31_0_,
> this_.tags_cached AS tags20_31_0_,
> this_.images_cached AS images21_31_0_,
> this_.ncomments AS ncommen22_31_0_,
> this_.group_order AS group23_31_0_,
> this_.author AS author24_31_0_,
> this_.proper_a AS proper25_31_0_,
> this_.duration AS duratio26_31_0_,
> this_.isloop AS isloop27_31_0_,
> this_.seo_country AS seo28_31_0_,
> this_.seo_region AS seo29_31_0_,
> this_.seo_place AS seo30_31_0_,
> this_.source AS source31_31_0_,
> this_.source_name AS source32_31_0_,
> this_.api_key AS api33_31_0_,
> this_.ratingui AS ratingu34_31_0_,
> this_.nratings AS nrating35_31_0_,
> this_.trailrank AS trailra36_31_0_,
> this_.ncoords AS ncoords37_31_0_,
> this_.egeom AS egeom38_31_0_,
> this_.elevels AS elevels39_31_0_,
> this_.elevations AS elevati40_31_0_,
> this_.nphotoswpts AS nphotos41_31_0_,
> this_.nfavourited AS nfavour42_31_0_,
> this_.ncompanions AS ncompan43_31_0_,
> this_.group_id AS group44_31_0_
> FROM spatial_artifact this_
> WHERE this_.group_id IS NULL
> AND this_.propietari=7649
> ORDER BY this_.id DESC LIMIT 20
>
>
> *--PRIMARY SERVER *(EXPLAIN ANALYZE output)
>
> "Limit (cost=0.43..22734.71 rows=20 width=604) (actual
> time=1804.124..293469.085 rows=20 loops=1)"
> " -> Index Scan Backward using "PK_SPATIAL_ARTIFACT" on spatial_artifact
> this_ (cost=0.43..7776260.84 rows=6841 width=604) (actual
> time=1804.121..293469.056 rows=20 loops=1)"
> " Filter: ((group_id IS NULL) AND (propietari = 7649))"
> " Rows Removed by Filter: 2848286"
> "Total runtime: *293469.135 ms*"
>
>
> *--STANDBY SERVER *(EXPLAIN ANALYZE output)
>
> "Limit (cost=23533.73..23533.78 rows=20 width=604) (actual
> time=2.566..2.569 rows=20 loops=1)"
> " -> Sort (cost=23533.73..23550.83 rows=6841 width=604) (actual
> time=2.566..2.567 rows=20 loops=1)"
> " Sort Key: id"
> " Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 35kB"
> " -> Index Scan using idx_own_spas on spatial_artifact this_
> (cost=0.43..23351.70 rows=6841 width=604) (actual time=0.037..2.119
> rows=618 loops=1)"
> " Index Cond: (propietari = 7649)"
> "Total runtime: *2.612 ms*"
>
>
> I've run ANALYZE on my table and have reindexed the index idx_own_spas on
> my primary server, but it hasn't helped.
>
> Here is the postgresql config of my two servers:
>
> *--PRIMARY SERVER *(postgresql.conf)
> shared_buffers = 8GB
> work_mem = 42MB
> maintenance_work_mem = 2GB
> effective_cache_size = 44GB
>
>
what are the values of random_page_cost and seq_page_cost?
Also what might help here is the number of rows and pages in the table -
select relpages,reltuples, relname from pg_class where relname in ('
idx_own_spas ','spatial_artifact','PK_SPATIAL_ARTIFACT');
> *--**STANDBY** SERVER *(postgresql.conf)
> shared_buffers = 800MB
> work_mem = 20MB
> maintenance_work_mem = 128MB
> effective_cache_size = 1024MB
>
>
>
> Could you shed some light into why this is happening? Thank you.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kaixi
>
--
--
Best Regards
Sameer Kumar | DB Solution Architect
*ASHNIK PTE. LTD.*
101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069 533
T: +65 6438 3504 | M: +65 8110 0350 | www.ashnik.com
