On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:17:58AM +0200, Chris Travers wrote:
> The replication section made me wonder though if they were using the right
> replication solution for the job. If you don't want an on-disk copy, don't
> use
> physical replication. This being said there is one serious issue here that is
> worth mentioning, which is that since autovacuum on the master has no
> knowledge
> of autovacuum on the slave, it is easy to have longer-running queries on a
> slave that have rows they need to see removed by autovacuum and replication.
Uh, see hot_standby_feedback:
#hot_standby_feedback = off # send info from standby to
prevent
# query conflicts
> All of the above being said, there are solutions to all the major problems.
> But you have to know about them, where to look, and what to do. And with
> higher scale, one very important aspect is that attention to detail starts to
> matter a whole lot. I agree that there are some good points raised but I
> wonder what the solutions are. There is room for some improvement in the
> backend (it would really be nice to instrument and measure toasting/detoasting
> overhead in explain analyze) but for a lot of these I wonder if that is
> secondary. PostgreSQL is very well optimized for a certain series of tasks,
> and one can build well optimized solutions well outside that. At a certain
> point (including a certain scale) therewill be no substitute for a teamof
> people who really know the db backend inside and out who can design around
> limitations and I think that is true for all databases I have worked with.
Watching the video was helpful:
https://vimeo.com/145842299
You can see the failover happened because of various user errors. That
doesn't excuse our bug, but I am not sure exactly how much they
understood of Postgres behavior. His talk near the end about the
replication infrastucture being exposed to them was also interesting.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
