On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> But yeah, the existing code raises false positive serialization
> failures under SERIALIZABLE, and that's visible in the isolation test
> I posted: there is actually a serial order of those transactions with
> the same result.

I was under the impression that false positives of this kind are
allowed by SSI. Why focus on this false positive scenario in

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to