valeriof wrote: > BTW, a comment says this about the floating point representation: "A > deprecated compile-time option of PostgreSQL switches to a floating-point > representation of some date/time > fields. Npgsql (currently) does not support this mode." Is it safe to say > that the floating point format is less in use compared to the long int? If > Npgsql doesn't support it, any application that uses Npgsql will have this > limitation anyway. Am I correct?
It looks that way. 64-bit integer representation for datetimes was introduced in 7.3 and became the default in 8.4, over 7 years ago. So I guess you won't encounter databases with floating point datetimes very often these days. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
