Thanks Tom On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote: > > Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as > > expected before 9.5. No idea offhand what broke it. > > The answer is, I broke it, through some ill-advised neatnik-ism :-(, > ie clearing a field I thought would be unused but it wasn't. > > Fix pushed. Thanks for the report! > > regards, tom lane >
