Ping...
Any feedback is welcome, thanks.
På torsdag 12. januar 2017 kl. 13:13:34, skrev Andreas Joseph Krogh <
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>>:
Hi PostgresPro-guys.
I've asked this before but didn't get any response, so I'll try again. I know
you have a lot on you plate...
On RUM's TODO-list is this:
* Allow multiple additional information (lexemes positions + timestamp).
* Add support for arrays. Will any of these items support storing BIGINT as
part of a tsvector+timestamp in the same index?
so one an have an index like this:
create index rum_idx on message using rum (fts_all some_opclass, folder_id,
received_timestamp) WITH (attach=received_timestamp, "to"=fts_all,
order_by_attach=t);
Making it possible for a query like this to use one index effectively:
WHERE fts_all @@ to_tsquery('simple', 'andre:*&jose:*') AND folder_id = ANY(
ARRAY[2,3]::BIGINT[]) ORDER BY received_timestamp DESC LIMIT 10;
The reason I ask is that storing only tsvector+timestamp often is't enough
because often there is some other dimention which is *very* relevant to limit
the results (like what folder, or account, to search for email-messages in,
instead of searching for all in the system).
Thanks.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
<https://www.visena.com>
