Hi, 2017-04-05 1:55 GMT+02:00 Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>:
> On 04/04/2017 07:45 AM, Tom DalPozzo wrote: > > Postgres version? > 9.6.1 > > Hi, >> I had two replication slots on my primary. Slaves off and (around 800) >> WALs kept as expected. >> > > Slaves off means?: > > You replication set up from the master to the slaves(how many?). > Then you disconnected the slaves how? > > I have 2 slaves configured with async replication but they were down when I dropped the slots. So the 800 WALs number mean you have wal_keep_segments set to 800? > No, wal_keep_segments is commented. 800 is the rough number of files I saw in xlog dir before dropping the slots. > > > I dropped those slots but over time, the system kept on adding new WALs >> without reusing them or deleting them. >> Only after shutdown and restart the system deleted those WAL files. >> Is that ok? >> regards >> Pupillo >> >> >> > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.kla...@aklaver.com > Regards Pupillo
