> On 18 Apr 2017, at 10:13, agharta <aghart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a problem with INSERT ... ON CONFLICT sql command.
> 
> Reading 9.6 documentation i see that ON  CONFLICT command will accpets only 
> index_column_name or index_expression (unique composite/primary indexes are 
> valid too).
> 
> So, my problem is that i can't create any type of upsert-valid index . Let me 
> explain.
> 
> I have a table T1 containing  F1, F2, F3, F4 fields.
> 
> I can insert same records in T1, MAX TWICE.

How is UPSERT supposed to know which of a pair of duplicate records it is 
supposed to update? You'll have to make them unique somehow. The safest 
approach is usually to add a surrogate key based on a sequence.

> I can have records like (A,B,C,D),(B,A,D,C), etc.. and  (A,B,C,D) AGAIN. Any 
> other next insert of (A,B,C,D) is not allowed (actually it is avoided by a 
> complex-and-slow-performance select count in before insert/update trigger).  

You're probably better off with an EXISTS query there. Something like:

select F1, F2, F3, F4,
    case
        when exists (select 1 from T1 t where t.F1 = T1.F1 and t.F2 = T1.F2 and 
t.F3 = T1.F3 and t.F4 = T1.F4 and t.pk <> T1.pk) then 1
        else 0
    end as have_duplicate
from T1
where F1 = NEW.F1 and F2 = NEW.F2 and F3 = NEW.F3 and F4 = NEW.F4
limit 1;

The pk field in there is the surrogate key from the previous paragraph.

Alternatively, wrap your COUNT around a sub-query that's limited to 2 results. 
No extra pk needed in that case, unless you still need to use UPSERT with that.

In either case it will make a big difference to have an index on at least (F1, 
F2, F3, F4), perhaps with the new pk column added at the end.

> In this case i can't create any type of primary/unique index, like a 
> composite F1,F2, F3, F4 index. (correct me if i am wrong please).

Correct, you'll most likely have to add a new one (unless someone comes up with 
better suggestions).

Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to