On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 04:11 PM, Max Wang wrote: > >> Hi Amitabh, >> >> >> >> Thank you for suggestion. We did not reach the limit of serial type. >> Some tables only have hundreds of rows. >> > > It would helpful if you ran the query I showed in my previous post on one > the sequences just so we can see. > > From subsequent post of yours: > > "Sorry. I mean all tables’ id column were reset to 1." > > I thought I understood on this, now I am not sure. Do you mean that the > actual values in the id column in all the tables have been set to 1 or that > the serial sequence that controls the id value has been set to 1? > > > >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Max >> >> >> > > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.kla...@aklaver.com > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > *Just to help clarify things, please execute and attach the output from the following query.SELECT sequence_schema, sequence_name, start_value, maximum_value, cycle_option FROM information_schema.sequences ORDER BY 1, 2; * -- *Melvin Davidson* I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
