On April 30, 2017 1:37:02 PM GMT+02:00, "Thomas Güttler" <guettl...@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >Is is possible that PostgreSQL will replace these building blocks in >the future? > > - redis (Caching) > - rabbitmq (amqp) > - s3 (Blob storage)
These are three very different sets of functionalities, each requiring a different approach. I am curious as to why you are thinking about having a single piece of software that does these three very different things. >One question is "is it possible?", then next "is it feasible?" Possible? Sure: p != 0 Probable? No Desirable? No >I think it would be great if I could use PG only and if I could >avoid the other types of servers. When you're holding a hammer, everything looks like a nail. But hammering screws doesn't get you very far. Sometimes you need a screwdriver and on other days a glue gun... >The benefit is not very obvious on the first sight. I think it will >saves you >time, money and energy only in the long run. > >What do you think? Do one thing(*) and do that thing well. Don't try to be everything to everyone. -- Thomas (Sent from my mobile device, please forgive brevity or typos.) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
