John Havard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there anyway to do this without having to resort to writing the
> functions in C or some other language?
You really cannot write datatype I/O functions in anything but C,
because the I/O functions have to deal in C-style strings, which are
not a SQL datatype; so there is no way to describe the necessary
behavior in any PL language.
There has been some talk of promoting "C string" to be at least a
second-class SQL datatype (on the order of being able to declare
functions that take or return them, but not use them as a column
datatype). Hasn't happened yet though.
> Why doesn't CREATE FUNCTION complain about plpgsql functions not being
> able to accept the opaque type as an argument?
Because it makes no assumptions about what abilities PL languages might
have. The PLs are plug-ins, remember.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
