> On Jun 10, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > […] but it'd be better to adjust the query to ensure a deterministic > update order.
Thank you for the answer. Since `update` has no `order by` clause, I’m guessing there’s no way to do this with just the `update` statement, and that I should use `select … order by … for update’ for this. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
