Hi, guys, On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> writes: >> On 7/20/2017 8:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Hm, we need to update that text for the new 2-part version numbering >>> scheme, don't we? > >> will 10 return like 100100 if its 10.1, or 100001 ? > > The latter. The two middle digits will be zeroes henceforth, unless > we somehow get into a situation where the minor version needs to > exceed 99.
MySQL uses this: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/mysql-get-server-version.html. Is it safe to assume that PostgreSQL calculates the version the same way? Thank you. > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
