"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it's desired behavior, exactly, but there's no very
>> good way to improve it. pg_ctl has no visibility into what the postmaster
>> is thinking.
> The function signature (and docs) for pg_reload_conf makes the OPs
> interpretation understandable.
Yeah. After more thought, it occurs to me that now that we did f13ea95f9,
we could improve matters by extending that concept: the postmaster could
record its last reload time in postmaster.pid along with a success/failure
flag, and pg_ctl could watch that file to detect what happened.
(No, I'm not volunteering to write the patch.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
