On 2017-09-28 08:19:08 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > This is one of the MANY reasons test_decoding isn't suitable as the base > for a replication solution. It has "test" in its name for a reason.
FWIW, I don't see why the unchanged toast stuff is that. It's clearly discernible from actual datums, so ... I agree that test_decoding isn't a great base of a replication tool, but I don't think it's completely unsuitable, and I also think that ship has sailed. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
