On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > and did not see any untoward behavior, at least not till I got to enough > temp tables to overrun the master's shared lock table, and even then it > cleaned up fine. At no point was the standby process consuming anywhere > near as much CPU as the master's backend. > > What am I missing to reproduce the problem?
Just a guess, but do you disable autovacuum on your dev machine? (I know I do.) It's possible that this is relevant: https://postgr.es/m/CAB-EU3RawZx8-OzMfvswFf6z+Y7GOZf03TZ=bez+pbqx+a4...@mail.gmail.com -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
