On 10/30/2017 10:32 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Rob Sargent <rsarg...@xmission.com> wrote:
I’ve hit this same message
Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: right sibling of GIN
page is of different type
in a couple of contexts and I’m starting to get worried.
I’ve rebuilt the index, but will that help?
Is there a way to see what the ‘different type’ is?
Is it caught/clean-up by vacuum analyse or some such?
Is there a lot of churn on this table? Do you either heavily update or
heavily delete rows in the table? Does vacuum tend to run on the table
rather frequently?
Peter, you beat me to the punch. I was just about to say "Having read
the referenced message I thought I would add that we never delete from
this table." In this particular case it was written to record by
record, in a previous execution and at the time of the error it was only
being read. (In case you've been following, the failed execution would
have added ~1M "segments", each which references an entry in the gin'd
table "probandsets" - but like a rookie I'm looking up each
probandset(2^16) individually. Re-working that NOW.)
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
