On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Karsten Hilbert <karsten.hilb...@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:23:07PM +0530, Sachin Kotwal wrote: > > > You are right. Those naming conventions are old and that is why we have > to > > improve those where ever and when ever required. > > I'd love to see the "requirement" defined. > > Regards, > Karsten > -- > GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net > E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > *All,* *Please take note that when PG 9.2 was release, a column rename of* *"procpid" to just "pid" in pg_stat_activity DID break prior user code,* *therefore I must strongly advise against any other unnecessary column* *renames in system catalogs.* -- *Melvin Davidson* I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
