"Fred Ingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After dropping and recreating the indexes I have (in KB):
Ah, that's more like it.
> So, it appears that I am running into the pathological case.
Actually, a simpler explanation would be if you'd done a bunch of
updates and/or deletes at some point. VACUUM currently never shrinks
indexes, so the excess index space might just represent the peak size
of your tables. (Yes, improving that is on the to-do list.)
> In short, they are all needed for acceptable performance querying and
> retrieving values from the database.
You've got common queries that do selects with WHERE clauses referencing
each one of these columns? Possible, certainly, but seems a bit odd...
> With respect to mySQL, I did verify that mySQL did in fact have all of the
> indexes I created and that they were saved in a single file (the *.MYI).
Hm. Anyone know how mySQL represents indexes? That still seems awfully
small.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
