> It looks like Red Hat has announced an open source database called Red Hat > Database: > > (via slashdot:) > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010619/tc/red_hat_to_play_in_oracle_s_ar ena_1.html > > Why is this not PostgreSQL? Why can't the Red Hat folks sell support to > PostgreSQL, rather than developing another open source database and > supporting that? Is it a conflict with GreatBridge? This looks like it could > have been a great opportunity for PostgreSQL.... If it's "Red Hat Database", then not only does it promote their brand and supposed worth, then people will more readily come to them for a support contract. If it were Postgres, they'd probably just sign up to the mailing list. : ) steve ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
