> >         Can we test for this at configure time and spit out a warning
> > message to the user that they need to upgrade their version of glibc?
> 
> I think most of the people who are getting bitten have installed PG from
> RPMs, so configure couldn't help them anyway.

::grrr::  I have nothing nice to say about RPM's and the headaches they
have caused me in the past.  Is it late to lobby Linux and/or Red Hat
and ask them for a new package format similar to the ports tree?  
::grin:: In any case, Tom, you're right again as always.

> Perhaps our future RPMs should have a dependency that requires glibc
> version >= first fixed version.

        Far beit for me to disagree...  was this bug in only Linux's 
glibc?

        -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl

Reply via email to