"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just looking at that fkey violation message yesterday and thinking how
> much better it would be to be able to see the offending value in the
> message. Is that what 7.4 shows?
You mean like this?
regression=# create table t1 (f1 int primary key);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 't1_pkey' for table 't1'
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create table t2 (f2 int references t1);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY check(s)
CREATE TABLE
regression=# insert into t2 values(42);
ERROR: $1 referential integrity violation - key (f2)=(42) referenced from t2 not
found in t1
regression=#
I'm still wondering how to rephrase this to fit in the
recently-agreed-to message style guidelines. I think the
(col names)=(values) part must go into errdetail, but I'm
fuzzy beyond that. Comments?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
