On Wednesday 03 December 2003 13:36, Alistair Hopkins wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to write a generic audit-trail trigger function which will > record changes on a field-by-field basis to a single table for all audited > tables. > > However, I find that I can only access a field in OLD and NEW if I know the > name in advance. Is there any way I can access the fields when I only have > a variable containing the name of the field? > > If I can do this, I can make a really simple, schema-change-resistent, low > storage size audit trail for high read / low change databases.
Not in plpgsql, but I believe you can in pl/tcl, which I think is quite mature. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match