speaking as someone currently migrating enterprise stuff to postgres.... point-in-time is definitely the biggest issue.
this is the main thing we are having to look reproducing using some form of replication to an alternative server. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Gigger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2004 19:09 To: Cott Lang; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] tablespaces a priority for 7.5? > On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:05, Brian Maguire wrote: > > > In my opinion, it really is a critical feature to support and administer > > enterprise databases. All the major databases currently support this > > and it is a compelling enough reason drive big users from away from > > using postgres for their enterprise/large databases. It really is a > > database administrator's feature. > > It seems to me that the lack of point-in-time recovery is a much bigger > roadblock against big users. :( This is certainly my feeling. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
