"Glen Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I say it's broken though, I'm talking more specifically about trying to
> use round(float, int); is there some reason that this function overload
> should not exist in the absence of an implicit float->numeric cast?

Send a patch ... I don't recall anyone ever claiming that Postgres has a
complete set of functions ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to