Hey....that's neat. All this time, I've done an unncessary extra select to see if the value has changed because of competing processes trying to work on same row....
Once again...kudos to lists like this one and of course, RTFM.
Jeff
Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Amiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"the docs say that in case of locked rows the where clause is reevaluated: "
Is this true?
Which docs are you refering to (I could find no mention in the postgres docs).....
Second paragraph in http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/transaction-iso.html#XACT-READ-COMMITTED
regards, tom lane
-- Jeff Amiel Systems/Development Manager iStream Imaging, an iTeam Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (262) 796-0925 x1011
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly