On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:What I've done doesn't eliminate (or shouldn't) the desire for a comp.* hierarchy of groups for postgresql, it just means that the what will end up still being considered bogus groups will be able to still be accessible by those that wish to ...
BTW, you indicated that one of the reasons pressing you to move was that Google had dropped indexing services for the comp.* groups. Have they given you an indication that they would index pgsql.*, or are we just out of luck on that service?
Right now, from what I've seen/read, even if the RFD/CFV goes through, google will only pick up those 4 or 5 that were approved ... from checking on Google itself, it looks like other then the Big8, they pretty much archive all the non-Big8 hierarchies ...
But, if those 4-5 do end up passing, we can gate those on top of the "private hierarchy" from a propogation perspective ...
---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
