> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 10:53:37PM -0500, Berend Tober wrote: > >> I learned that the unusual behavior (or at least the behavior that >> seems weird to me) regarding relational integrity and uniquness >> constraints as been around for a while, and some people actually think >> is is SUPPOSED to work that way ... > > Who would that be? Because I've always thought that most people > (everyone?) think of it as a bug that nobody has bothered to fix. Not > that the fix is easy, mind you ...
Sorry, I can't name names from recollection. One of the posts I read from a few years ago was prefaced with some comment like "I'm not sure its really a bug...but" and some talk about "the SQL Standard". My personal take-away was that the behavior was not going to be fixed in the near term and that I could not count on the behavior I expected, so I abandoned the use of inheritance and implemented as described. And don't say "fix it yourself" because I might be inclined to try, if I had the appropriate skills. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings