On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 10:23:50 +0100,
Ralph van Etten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I think there are situations where a serial isn't convenient
> Like when you want an primary key which consists of the current
> year and an sequence number. Like ('05', 1), ('05', 2), ('05', 3) etc.
> With a sequence you must write extra code to reset the sequence every year
> and you get into trouble if someone inserts data from the previous year...
> A 'MAX(id)+1' is much simpler and cleaner then.
You don't normally want to do that either. You should use one sequence for all
of the years.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
