"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, every other database I've used can do index covering, which means > index scans *are* faster.
Still not necessarily true. In a case like this it would still be random access which would be slower than sequential access. Though Oracle is capable of taking the best of both worlds and doing a hash join but taking the data from sequentially reading the index instead of the table. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
