On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:47:17AM -0800, Ben wrote:
> Ho ho, flame on! :)
>
> My completely annecodal experience with devs which prefer windows over
> posix is that the former prods things until they seem to work and accepts
> unexplained behavior far more readily than the latter. Do I *really* want
> that kind of mentality in my database devs?
Of course not, and I don't think there's any risk of this happening. Are
you aware that every patch submitted for inclusion goes through a code
review? It's very insightful to see the discussion and mentality on the
-hackers list; data integrity is always the absolute number 1 priority.
Anyone who wants to code for PostgreSQL who doesn't share that priority
won't last long at all.
> Anyway, I think you have the focus wrong. It's not: "run our software on
> what we tell you to".... it's more: "we believe this platform is better
> than others, so we'll write our free software for that. But if you want to
> port it over to the platform of your choice, have fun doing that."
With the attitude of "Windows can not be made to reliably run a
database", how many developers do you think will be attracted?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
