"Thomas F.O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Instinctively, it seems like it would be nice to have something similar > for checkpoint_timeout, but is there any disadvantage to having a value > "dramatically" higher than the default for general use, considering > that checkpoint_timeout can only be set at server start?
Huh? IIRC you can change all the checkpoint parameters with SIGHUP. You can *not* set them per-connection, that just doesn't make any physical sense considering that the behavior involved is cluster-wide. I doubt that checkpoint_timeout is very important to raise anyway. Now checkpoint_segments is something you might well need to raise... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org