Jeff Amiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We've been struggling for several days now to come up with a mechanism 
> that allows us to establish a mechanism to store data that remains 
> persistent for the life of the connection.

Why don't you just store it in a temporary table?  Goes away at
connection drop by definition ... and each connection can use the same
name for the temp table, so coding is easy.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to