To answer my own question, "No it won't work." I still get a unique constraint error.
On Friday 25 March 2005 04:10 pm, Terry Lee Tucker saith: > Hi, > > If I were to set the value of pg_class.indisunique on a unique index to > False inside a transaction so I could juggle sequence numbers around on a > table with a unique two element index, and then set it back again to its > proper value, all in the same transaction, would that allow me to > temorarily override the unique index behavior? Is it safe to temporarily > change the value of that column? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
