On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Poul Møller Hansen wrote:
> >This sort of thing has been seen to occur when multiple client-side > >threads try to use the same database connection without proper locking > >to ensure only one thread uses it at a time. See for example > >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00104.php > > > This is exactly what I am doing. Must admit I haven't considered that as > an issue. For performance reasons I suppose one database connection per > client are preferred rather than using synchronized on the db class ? > The JDBC driver should be doing any synchronization necessary for multiple threads. Could you be more clear what you are doing? What driver version? Any chance you've got a reproducible example? Kris Jurka ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
