On 23.04.2005 03:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I not use MONEY in defining such fields to be used with ACCESS? Is there a different TYPE that I should use in my definition? Thanks!

From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/datatype-money.html

"The money type is deprecated. Use numeric or decimal instead, in combination with the to_char function."

By the way, what would you suggest as a tool to administer the PostgreSQL databases. I mean, something sort of graphical which would display tables and names and relationships.

In case you don't like PgAdminIII you may try commercial products like

EMS PostgreSQL Manager
http://sqlmanager.net/products/postgresql/manager

What they call "Visual Database Designer" might just be what you are looking for. It's an MS-Access-like, visual display of tables and relations. But remember, it's a frontend and not a modelling tool.

For modelling better look at:

http://www.casestudio.com/

I don't think there's something better out there for the money, but it takes some time to learn using it.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to