Probably, turning fsync off would be helpful, since you know it is read-only.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-general- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:01 PM > To: David Parker > Cc: postgres general > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] rollback vs. commit for closing read-only > transaction > > David Parker wrote: > > If an application transaction is known to be read-only, is there any > > reason to prefer COMMIT or ROLLBACK for closing that transaction? Would > > there be any performance difference between the two commands? > > Doesn't matter. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania > 19073 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
