w/o reading the URL docs, it sounds suspiciously like "tagged command queueing" for sequential scans.
<pause for comedic effect> I wonder what the best way to spend $7K for performance improvement might be? ;-) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:46 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] Very interesting article about the future of databases For those who didn't see it on slashdot: http://www.acmqueue.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=293 What's interesting is that PostgreSQL is already working on some of these things. Of note, there's a patch to allow sequential scans to 'piggyback' on top of other sequential scans. See the quote "For petabyte-scale databases, the only solution may be to run continuous data scans, with queries piggybacked on top of the scans." on page 4. There's also been discussion about how to more intelligently cost UDF's, something also mentioned on page 4. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
