On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 16:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It appears from checking the output of exponentiation of one numeric to
> > another, the output is actually in floating point. Is this normal and /
> > or expected?
>
> Yes, seeing that the only ^ operator we have is float8.
>
> regression=# \do ^
> List of operators
> Schema | Name | Left arg type | Right arg type | Result type |
> Description
> ------------+------+------------------+------------------+------------------+----------------------
> pg_catalog | ^ | double precision | double precision | double precision |
> exponentiation (x^y)
> (1 row)
But is this proper behaviour?
Considering that the SQL spec says the result of multiplication of exact
numeric types is exact numeric types of precision S1+S2, and
exponentiation is nothing more than repeated multiplication, should
postgresql have a numeric capable exponentiation operator? Since I've
finally got a job where I can actually hack on the clock a bit, it might
be a nice trial balloon. It'll take a week or two to knock the rust off
my C skills though. :)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
