Hi All, Can someone please address this aspect of Sebastian's email? I, too, am interested in the response.
>> Why does Postgres perform an update on the table even >> if no data changes? >> Can I circumvent this behaviour of Postgres? Tim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sebastian Böck Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:06 AM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: [GENERAL] Update on tables when the row doesn't change Hi all, Maybe it's a very silly question, but why does Postgres perform an update on the table even if no data changes? I recognized this recently doing a rewrite of my rules because they took to long. I had many conditional rules I collapsed to one unconditional rule, so that the views get constructed only once. If I split these updates to the underlying tables, I get a lot of updates which don't perform any "real" updates. Can I circumvent this behaviour of Postgres only by defining lot of rules / triggers on these underlying table are there some trickier ways? Any help appreciated, Sebastian ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
