--- "Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil,
>
> If you complete this patch, I'm very interested to see it.
>
> I think I'm the person Matthew is talking about who inserted a sleep
>
> value. Because of the sheer number of tables involved, even small
> values of sleep caused pg_autovacuum to iterate too slowly over its
> table lists to be of use in a production environment (where I still
> find its behavior to be preferable to a complicated list of manual
> vacuums performed in cron).
>
> --
> Thomas F. O'Connell
> Co-Founder, Information Architect
> Sitening, LLC
>
Were you sleeping every time through the loop? How about something
like:
if (j%500 == 1) usleep(100000)
Regards,
Shelby Cain
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
