>Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
>> [* Actually, I think NULLs are typed in SQL, which means you should be
>> able to get type violations. ]
>
>I'm pretty sure the entire construct is illegal per a strict reading of
>the SQL spec --- the spec only allows NULL to appear in contexts where a
>datatype can be assigned to it immediately.
Honestly I cannot say this info changes too much for me (other DBMSs I use as
backend handle this untyped NULLs), though the situation is clarified.
Thanks a lot.
--
Best regards
Ilja Golshtein
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
