Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm looking for an equivalent of my_composite_type[] for use as a > parameter of a pl/pgsql function. What do people use to dodge this > limitation? > > Background: I have a few plpgsql functions that basically accept an > array of objects decomposed into arrays of the objects' attributes:
What do you want to do with these arrays? Why do you want to work with them in plpgsql? When you get to this point I think I would start looking at using plperl and using Dumper to store the objects in a text column. You're trading off database normalization against being able to express arbitrarily complex data structures. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
