* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Sweet, indeed it is. DISTINCT ON seems to be a postgresism, but I can > >> live with that. > > > Uhhh, I was pretty sure it was standard SQL... > > Nope, definitely a Postgres-ism.
Huh. Guess I suck then. I actually do this a fair bit, is there any
way to do it in standard SQL? It's terribly useful...
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
