Let me also say that I'm retarded. No excuses from me. I'm officially retarded.
--- Matthew Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. That syntax didn't look right to find values > gte 10000. But thanks everyone! > > > > --- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Matthew Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes. I did read it wrong. I wanted to find all > > records > > > that contained x where x >= 10000 > > > > Then flip it around: > > > > contain x where 10000 <= x > > > > 10000 <= ANY (array) > > > > For syntactic reasons, there's no "ANY(array) >= > x" > > construct, > > so you have to write it this way. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
